Name | Birth date | Age | ID | Sex |
---|---|---|---|---|
--- | 10/26/2021 | 52 | 1234 | M |
Modality | Examination date | Voxel size | Protocol name |
---|---|---|---|
MR | 10/26/2021 | 3.3 x 0.86 x 0.86 mm³ | T2 Sag |
Measure | Explanation |
---|---|
T10-11: disc height | At Disc T10-11 is the disc height too low. |
T11-12: disc height | At Disc T11-12 is the disc height too low. |
L4-5: disc height | At Disc L4-5 is the disc height too low. |
L5-S1: disc height | At Disc L5-S1 is the disc height too low. |
C2-3: disc height | At Disc C2-3 the disc height is ok. |
C3-4: disc height | At Disc C3-4 the disc height is ok. |
C4-5: disc height | At Disc C4-5 the disc height is ok. |
C5-6: disc height | At Disc C5-6 the disc height is ok. |
C6-7: disc height | At Disc C6-7 the disc height is ok. |
C7-T1: disc height | At Disc C7-T1 the disc height is ok. |
T1-2: disc height | At Disc T1-2 the disc height is ok. |
T2-3: disc height | At Disc T2-3 the disc height is ok. |
T3-4: disc height | At Disc T3-4 the disc height is ok. |
T4-5: disc height | At Disc T4-5 the disc height is ok. |
T5-6: disc height | At Disc T5-6 the disc height is ok. |
T6-7: disc height | At Disc T6-7 the disc height is ok. |
T7-8: disc height | At Disc T7-8 the disc height is ok. |
T8-9: disc height | At Disc T8-9 the disc height is ok. |
T9-10: disc height | At Disc T9-10 the disc height is ok. |
T10-11: disc height | At Disc T10-11 the disc height is ok. |
T11-12: disc height | At Disc T11-12 the disc height is ok. |
T12-L1: disc height | At Disc T12-L1 the disc height is ok. |
L1-2: disc height | At Disc L1-2 the disc height is ok. |
L2-3: disc height | At Disc L2-3 the disc height is ok. |
L3-4: disc height | At Disc L3-4 the disc height is ok. |
L4-5: disc height | At Disc L4-5 the disc height is ok. |
L5-S1: disc height | At Disc L5-S1 the disc height is ok. |
Vertebra Annotation | overview of vertebra annotation |
The disc height at T10-11 should be ≥ 5.9mm, but is 5.7 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T11-12 should be ≥ 6.4mm, but is 5.1 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L4-5 should be ≥ 9.0mm, but is 5.9 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 1833 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L5-S1 should be ≥ 5.7mm, but is 4.2 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 1703 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at C2-3 has the value 6.8 mm (57.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at C3-4 has the value 6.7 mm (41.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at C4-5 has the value 6.6 mm (39.0% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at C5-6 has the value 5.2 mm (19.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at C6-7 has the value 5.2 mm (17.0% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at C7-T1 has the value 5.9 mm (8.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T1-2 has the value 5.7 mm (13.0% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T2-3 has the value 6.0 mm (31.7% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T3-4 has the value 6.0 mm (49.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T4-5 has the value 6.2 mm (72.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T5-6 has the value 5.8 mm (47.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T6-7 has the value 6.6 mm (74.5% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T7-8 has the value 6.3 mm (45.5% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T8-9 has the value 5.3 mm (8.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T9-10 has the value 5.9 mm (10.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T10-11 has the value 5.7 mm (3.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T11-12 has the value 5.1 mm (1.1% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at T12-L1 has the value 8.9 mm (27.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L1-2 has the value 9.1 mm (9.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L2-3 has the value 13.1 mm (58.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1881 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L3-4 has the value 16.3 mm (96.1% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1882 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L4-5 has the value 5.9 mm (1.0% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1833 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
The disc height at L5-S1 has the value 4.2 mm (1.1% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1703 patients, 47 - 57 years, male
name of all vertebrae