Medical Report
Person
| Name | Birth date | Age | ID | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| --- | 10/26/2021 | 47 | 1234 | F |
Data
| Modality | Examination date | Voxel size | Protocol name |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | 10/26/2021 | 3.3 x 0.86 x 0.86 mm³ | T2 Sag |
Overview
| Measure | Explanation |
|---|---|
| C2-3: disc height | At Disc C2-3 the disc height is ok. |
| C3-4: disc height | At Disc C3-4 the disc height is ok. |
| C4-5: disc height | At Disc C4-5 the disc height is ok. |
| C5-6: disc height | At Disc C5-6 the disc height is ok. |
| C6-7: disc height | At Disc C6-7 the disc height is ok. |
| C7-T1: disc height | At Disc C7-T1 the disc height is ok. |
| T1-2: disc height | At Disc T1-2 the disc height is ok. |
| T2-3: disc height | At Disc T2-3 the disc height is ok. |
| T3-4: disc height | At Disc T3-4 the disc height is ok. |
| T4-5: disc height | At Disc T4-5 the disc height is ok. |
| T5-6: disc height | At Disc T5-6 the disc height is ok. |
| T6-7: disc height | At Disc T6-7 the disc height is ok. |
| T7-8: disc height | At Disc T7-8 the disc height is ok. |
| T8-9: disc height | At Disc T8-9 the disc height is ok. |
| T9-10: disc height | At Disc T9-10 the disc height is ok. |
| T10-11: disc height | At Disc T10-11 the disc height is ok. |
| T11-12: disc height | At Disc T11-12 the disc height is ok. |
| T12-L1: disc height | At Disc T12-L1 the disc height is ok. |
| L1-2: disc height | At Disc L1-2 the disc height is ok. |
| L2-3: disc height | At Disc L2-3 the disc height is ok. |
| L3-4: disc height | At Disc L3-4 the disc height is ok. |
| L4-5: disc height | At Disc L4-5 the disc height is ok. |
| L5-S1: disc height | At Disc L5-S1 the disc height is ok. |
| Vertebra Annotation | overview of vertebra annotation |
Findings
C2-3: disc height
Description
The disc height at C2-3 has the value 7.5 mm (99.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
C3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at C3-4 has the value 7.6 mm (98.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1624 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
C4-5: disc height
Description
The disc height at C4-5 has the value 5.6 mm (24.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
C5-6: disc height
Description
The disc height at C5-6 has the value 4.5 mm (11.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1624 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
C6-7: disc height
Description
The disc height at C6-7 has the value 6.3 mm (40.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
C7-T1: disc height
Description
The disc height at C7-T1 has the value 7.1 mm (94.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T1-2: disc height
Description
The disc height at T1-2 has the value 6.7 mm (93.5% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T2-3: disc height
Description
The disc height at T2-3 has the value 6.4 mm (92.7% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at T3-4 has the value 6.1 mm (90.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T4-5: disc height
Description
The disc height at T4-5 has the value 6.2 mm (92.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T5-6: disc height
Description
The disc height at T5-6 has the value 6.4 mm (92.9% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T6-7: disc height
Description
The disc height at T6-7 has the value 6.4 mm (82.9% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T7-8: disc height
Description
The disc height at T7-8 has the value 6.9 mm (89.0% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T8-9: disc height
Description
The disc height at T8-9 has the value 6.6 mm (66.2% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T9-10: disc height
Description
The disc height at T9-10 has the value 7.3 mm (76.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T10-11: disc height
Description
The disc height at T10-11 has the value 6.6 mm (21.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T11-12: disc height
Description
The disc height at T11-12 has the value 8.4 mm (68.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
T12-L1: disc height
Description
The disc height at T12-L1 has the value 10.1 mm (87.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
L1-2: disc height
Description
The disc height at L1-2 has the value 10.8 mm (64.5% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
L2-3: disc height
Description
The disc height at L2-3 has the value 13.9 mm (94.5% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
L3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at L3-4 has the value 14.9 mm (95.9% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1625 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
L4-5: disc height
Description
The disc height at L4-5 has the value 14.5 mm (90.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1550 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
L5-S1: disc height
Description
The disc height at L5-S1 has the value 13.3 mm (84.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1475 patients, 42 - 52 years, female
Vertebra Annotation
Description
name of all vertebrae