Medical Report
Person
| Name | Birth date | Age | ID | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| --- | 10/26/2021 | 58 | 1234 | F |
Data
| Modality | Examination date | Voxel size | Protocol name |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | 10/26/2021 | 3.3 x 0.86 x 0.86 mm³ | T2 Sag |
Overview
| Measure | Explanation |
|---|---|
| C3-4: disc height | At Disc C3-4 is the disc height too low. |
| C3-4: sagittal spine diameter | At Disc C3-4 is the saggital spinal canal diameter too low. |
| C3-4: spinal canal sectional area | At Disc C3-4 is the spinal canal sectional area too low. |
| C4-5: sagittal spine diameter | At Disc C4-5 is the saggital spinal canal diameter too low. |
| C4-5: spinal canal sectional area | At Disc C4-5 is the spinal canal sectional area too low. |
| C5-6: sagittal spine diameter | At Disc C5-6 is the saggital spinal canal diameter too low. |
| C6-7: sagittal spine diameter | At Disc C6-7 is the saggital spinal canal diameter too low. |
| C6-7: spinal canal sectional area | At Disc C6-7 is the spinal canal sectional area too low. |
| C7-T1: sagittal spine diameter | At Disc C7-T1 is the saggital spinal canal diameter too low. |
| L4-5: spinal canal sectional area | At Disc L4-5 is the spinal canal sectional area too low. |
| L5-S1: disc height | At Disc L5-S1 is the disc height too low. |
| L5-S1: sagittal spine diameter | At Disc L5-S1 is the saggital spinal canal diameter too low. |
| L5-S1: spinal canal sectional area | At Disc L5-S1 is the spinal canal sectional area too low. |
| C2-3: disc height | At Disc C2-3 the disc height is ok. |
| C3-4: disc height | At Disc C3-4 the disc height is ok. |
| C4-5: disc height | At Disc C4-5 the disc height is ok. |
| C5-6: disc height | At Disc C5-6 the disc height is ok. |
| C6-7: disc height | At Disc C6-7 the disc height is ok. |
| C7-T1: disc height | At Disc C7-T1 the disc height is ok. |
| T1-2: disc height | At Disc T1-2 the disc height is ok. |
| T2-3: disc height | At Disc T2-3 the disc height is ok. |
| T3-4: disc height | At Disc T3-4 the disc height is ok. |
| T4-5: disc height | At Disc T4-5 the disc height is ok. |
| T5-6: disc height | At Disc T5-6 the disc height is ok. |
| T6-7: disc height | At Disc T6-7 the disc height is ok. |
| T7-8: disc height | At Disc T7-8 the disc height is ok. |
| T8-9: disc height | At Disc T8-9 the disc height is ok. |
| T9-10: disc height | At Disc T9-10 the disc height is ok. |
| T10-11: disc height | At Disc T10-11 the disc height is ok. |
| T11-12: disc height | At Disc T11-12 the disc height is ok. |
| T12-L1: disc height | At Disc T12-L1 the disc height is ok. |
| L1-2: disc height | At Disc L1-2 the disc height is ok. |
| L2-3: disc height | At Disc L2-3 the disc height is ok. |
| L3-4: disc height | At Disc L3-4 the disc height is ok. |
| L4-5: disc height | At Disc L4-5 the disc height is ok. |
| L5-S1: disc height | At Disc L5-S1 the disc height is ok. |
| Vertebra Annotation | overview of vertebra annotation |
Findings
C3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at C3-4 should be ≥ 4.8mm, but is 4.0 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 1673 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
C3-4: sagittal spine diameter
Description
The saggital spinal canal diameter at C3-4 should be ≥ 10.9mm, but is 9.2 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10209 patients
C3-4: spinal canal sectional area
Description
The spinal canal sectional area at C3-4 should be ≥ 1.4cm², but is 1.1 cm². The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10209 patients
C4-5: sagittal spine diameter
Description
The saggital spinal canal diameter at C4-5 should be ≥ 10.5mm, but is 8.7 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10208 patients
C4-5: spinal canal sectional area
Description
The spinal canal sectional area at C4-5 should be ≥ 1.2cm², but is 1.2 cm². The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10208 patients
C5-6: sagittal spine diameter
Description
The saggital spinal canal diameter at C5-6 should be ≥ 9.5mm, but is 9.3 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10213 patients
C6-7: sagittal spine diameter
Description
The saggital spinal canal diameter at C6-7 should be ≥ 10.0mm, but is 9.0 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10213 patients
C6-7: spinal canal sectional area
Description
The spinal canal sectional area at C6-7 should be ≥ 1.1cm², but is 0.9 cm². The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10213 patients
C7-T1: sagittal spine diameter
Description
The saggital spinal canal diameter at C7-T1 should be ≥ 11.3mm, but is 11.1 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 10214 patients
L4-5: spinal canal sectional area
Description
The spinal canal sectional area at L4-5 should be ≥ 0.7cm², but is 0.6 cm². The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 9849 patients
L5-S1: disc height
Description
The disc height at L5-S1 should be ≥ 4.4mm, but is 3.0 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 1526 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
L5-S1: sagittal spine diameter
Description
The saggital spinal canal diameter at L5-S1 should be ≥ 11.5mm, but is 10.5 mm. The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 9279 patients
L5-S1: spinal canal sectional area
Description
The spinal canal sectional area at L5-S1 should be ≥ 0.9cm², but is 0.5 cm². The value is in comparison to the cohort in the lower 5.0%-percentile. Statistic: 9279 patients
C2-3: disc height
Description
The disc height at C2-3 has the value 5.9 mm (49.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
C3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at C3-4 has the value 4.0 mm (1.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1673 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
C4-5: disc height
Description
The disc height at C4-5 has the value 5.3 mm (24.7% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
C5-6: disc height
Description
The disc height at C5-6 has the value 5.2 mm (51.0% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
C6-7: disc height
Description
The disc height at C6-7 has the value 4.7 mm (20.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
C7-T1: disc height
Description
The disc height at C7-T1 has the value 5.8 mm (28.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T1-2: disc height
Description
The disc height at T1-2 has the value 6.1 mm (60.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T2-3: disc height
Description
The disc height at T2-3 has the value 5.2 mm (20.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1673 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at T3-4 has the value 5.6 mm (64.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1673 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T4-5: disc height
Description
The disc height at T4-5 has the value 5.7 mm (69.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T5-6: disc height
Description
The disc height at T5-6 has the value 6.3 mm (90.7% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T6-7: disc height
Description
The disc height at T6-7 has the value 6.7 mm (91.9% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T7-8: disc height
Description
The disc height at T7-8 has the value 6.1 mm (60.9% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T8-9: disc height
Description
The disc height at T8-9 has the value 5.9 mm (38.3% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T9-10: disc height
Description
The disc height at T9-10 has the value 5.9 mm (21.1% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T10-11: disc height
Description
The disc height at T10-11 has the value 6.1 mm (11.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T11-12: disc height
Description
The disc height at T11-12 has the value 7.2 mm (21.6% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
T12-L1: disc height
Description
The disc height at T12-L1 has the value 8.9 mm (42.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
L1-2: disc height
Description
The disc height at L1-2 has the value 10.4 mm (47.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
L2-3: disc height
Description
The disc height at L2-3 has the value 11.5 mm (46.1% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
L3-4: disc height
Description
The disc height at L3-4 has the value 12.7 mm (67.4% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1674 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
L4-5: disc height
Description
The disc height at L4-5 has the value 10.3 mm (24.8% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1592 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
L5-S1: disc height
Description
The disc height at L5-S1 has the value 3.0 mm (1.2% percentile in comparison to the cohort). Statistic: 1526 patients, 53 - 63 years, female
Vertebra Annotation
Description
name of all vertebrae